Thursday , September 24 2020
Home / canada / Four things that Canadians should know if they are summoned for the duty of the jury

Four things that Canadians should know if they are summoned for the duty of the jury


The judges condemned Curtis Healy of first-degree murder this fall after having heard a brutal tale about how he raped and beat Dawns Baptist, a four-year-old Calgary mother, it with a rock in the head.

Healy is appealing, in part, because the judge did not declare a trial after it was revealed that some jurors had had a drink in the restaurant of the hotel even though they were already abducted.

There is no parole for 25 years for the man who killed the mother of Calgary Dawns Baptist

Hailed highlights were on television, others were present and a server took their orders.

Here are four things to know if you have chosen to serve the jury:

External contact is strictly limited while deliberating

While tests are presented, jury members have the freedom to go to life once they are done every day. He says they ignore everything they can see or hear about the case out of court. But once you are deliberating, they are held in the general public. If the day ends without a verdict, they are put in a hotel without access to Internet, telephones or television.

Court of Queen Bench Justice, Charlene Anderson, said the restaurant's visit was inadequate, but rejected Healy's request for ill-treatment. There was no evidence that the jurors had said, seen or heard anything about the case.

COMMENT: The Canadian jury deserves a better payment

Law professor at the University of Toronto, Kent Roach, says that a 24-hour news series and social media complicate things.

"We ask many of our members of the jury, both during the test and, of course, while they are kidnapped, that this age of the information we live in really live on."

The deliberations are secret

It is a criminal offense, with some exceptions, so that the jury will reveal what you have said during the deliberations. They can never explain why they made the decision they made, which prevents academics such as Roach from interviewing them for research.

Toronto lawyer Allan Rouben says he values ​​the justification of the ban, but that he wants more room for maneuver.

CLOCK: imprisoned to avoid the duty of the jury in Quebec

"The courts are concerned that they will have a creepy effect on the fiery debate that should occur in a jury room."

Rouben says that there are ways to cope with this, such as requiring the members of the jury to remain anonymous and make it clear that they have no obligation to speak.

He says that allowing judges to pronounce would be especially beneficial in those cases where they gave rise to a controversial verdict as the acquittal of a Saskatchewan farmer in the deadly death of an indigenous man.

"The benefits of the jury's communication outweigh the costs."

There are mental health considerations

Mark Farrant developed post-traumatic stress disorder after serving as head of the jury in a brutal murder trial of 2014. He could not sleep and retired from his loved ones.

"I was not able to divide the experience of the court and the images of my daily life."

Legal court cases can lead to PTDD of lawyers, juries

The man from Toronto says that he could not get support for the mental health of the courts after his duty to the jury. When he looked for a counselor himself, he had trouble finding someone to take it because of the secret rule.

The bill of a private member who approved the first reading in the House of Commons modified the Criminal Code to allow jurors to speak freely of a health professional.

Ex-jury with PEPT who heads to Parliament on the hill to support the trauma

Some provinces offer support to jury members, but a commission from the May Committee recommended a national approach. He also recommended that the jury receive a package of information on how to deal with stress and after debriefing sessions.

"We no longer have Canadians for the military," says Farrant. "I really consecrate you for the duty of the jury and it is a huge public and integral service of our justice system."

Compensation varies

The committees committee encouraged provinces and territories to grant jury a daily indemnity of at least $ 120.

In Newfoundland and Labrador, workers have to obtain their usual salaries during the duty of the jury. Everywhere, it corresponds to businessmen.

The Ontario jury, who spent 5 months in murder cases, filed suit after developing a PTSD

The current daily stipend varies widely throughout the country. It's about $ 50 in Alberta. In Ontario, a $ 40 subsidy per day only starts on day 11. Quebecers get $ 103 a day until day 57, when it rises to $ 160. There is also a reimbursement in Quebec for mileage, parking and meals and, for Judge's order, care and counseling for minors can be covered.

Source link