Why Bruce McArthur chose to plead guilty to eight first-degree murder charges was not explained on Tuesday morning, although the police let him know that the answers could still be reached.
The admission of McArthur in a Toronto court that killed eight men was not surprising: the police had said before a "significant development." But the guilty motives can be rare in the great trials because, during the leadership, the defense can determine the force of the case of the Crown, according to B.C. criminal lawyer Marilyn Sandford.
"The first question is always: can you prove your case?" Sandford, who was part of the legal team that represented the serial killer Robert Pickton, said in an interview with CBC News earlier this month.
"I want to give [your client] This opinion before you rush to negotiate a claim agreement because you have to be able to tell them the strengths and weaknesses of the case so they can make an informed decision about what to do. "
The McArthur test was expected from three to four months and the test date was set on January 6, 2020, which means that his team had almost a year to find weaknesses.
Out of court, Det. David Dickinson, one of the leading investigators in the case, indicated that he would comment on McArthur's motives to plead guilty later. Insp. Hank Idsinga, the person in charge of the investigation, also suggested that more information could be obtained about McArthur's motivation to plead guilty.
"Let's see what else goes to court next week," he told CBC News.
Instead, Ontario court judge John McMahon opened the procedures asking McArthur if he understood exactly what he wanted to plead guilty and warned that he could not plead guilty to things that He did not do just to overcome the case.
He understood McArthur, asked McMahon, who was relinquishing his right to a test?
McArthur simply responded: "Yes."
McMahon also asked if the former landscaper was pressured by relatives, friends, lawyers, or police officers involved in his case. McArthur said it was not.
McMahon said the guilty motive meant having to condemn McArthur to the life imprisonment. If you are going to serve your phrases simultaneously or consecutively it will be decided next week.
"As a result, you understand that you should serve at least until you are 91 years old before you can opt for parole," said McMahon. "Do you understand? Do you understand, sir?"
"Yes, your honor," said McArthur.
McArthur made his motive 11 days after the anniversary of his arrest, and one year later, the day after the police used the "assassin" tag for the first time. series " describe the author of the eight murders now condemned.
He was taken to the court with wives, his head shaved, with a blue sweater, one that has been used in numerous appearances in the court, with a checkered shirt and jeans.
It was a different image of a man smiling and looting with a goat, seen in Facebook images circulating in the media.
"This man is much older, he leaned, lost a lot of weight," said Karen Fraser, who had hired McArthur as a landscaper, and the goods he had used to bury his victims.
"I know a man who was always energetic, enthusiastic, eager to move on to the next. And that's just a broken man, how should he be."
The court was full, full of journalists, policemen, friends and family of the victims. The latter expressed a bit of emotion, feeling dizzy as the crimes of McArthur and his motives were said to the court.
McArthur stood still, with his fingertips leaning against the wooden flag at his head, his eyes on his head, looking madly, not seeing anyone, the judge, or the court clerk who read aloud each charge Assassinated, naming each victim of murder: Andrew Kinsman, 49, Selim Esen, 44, Skandaraj Navaratnam, 40, Abdulbasir Faizi, 44, Kirushna Kumar Kanagaratnam, 37, Dean Lisowick, 47, Soroush Mahmudi, 50, and Majeed Kayhan, 58,
Of the eight victims, seven had ties with the LGBT community in Toronto.
When the employee finished reading the charges, McArthur was summoned for one reason after each account.
"Guilty," he repeated eight times.
Several officers from the Toronto Police Department sat in the front of the room in front of the back of McArthur. These officers included Dickinson and Idsinga, who have become the face of this research that has called international attention.
"A little emotional, a little surreal" Idsinga said that he felt later. "Absolutely it's close. It's not happiness, it's not a thing to celebrate. It's good to do it."
It's still unclear how McArthur killed his victims. But what the court learned on Tuesday, in an abbreviated version of an agreed statement of facts, was that all eight murders were planned and deliberate, that six were of a sexual nature, that McArthur had saved some articles of the his victims as souvenirs and "I starred" some of them, although the meaning of this was not clarified.
It is anticipated that all these crimes will be revealed next week in a ruling hearing where friends and relatives will deliver statements of the victim's impact.
McMahon said he was hopeful to read the statements before the hour, and recalled that there are certain things that can and can not be included in these statements. Oaths or threats, for example, are not allowed.
"I do not want to be in a position on Mondays where I have to reject some of the statements of the impact of the victims of loved ones, since it does not fit in where we should be.
"It's important to see the impact it has had on their lives."
McMahon said it would be interesting if the case were to wrap up next week, "have a close for the family, for Mr. McArthur, for everyone involved."