Sunday , October 2 2022

The registration of Kamala Harris as a "progressive prosecutor" before a new scrutiny while looking at the eyes of 2020



[ad_1]

As speculation about the presidential aspirations of the United States, Kamala Harris, the California Democrat record as fiscal and state fiscal general attracts a new scrutiny.

The perception that 54-year-old Harris acted as a "progressive prosecutor" during his tenure as the District Attorney of San Francisco and the California Attorney General contradicted his actions, a law professor associated with the University of San Francisco argues in an oppressed work.

"Time after time, when the progressives urged her to adopt criminal justice reforms as a district attorney and then to the state's attorney general, Ms. Harris opposed or was He was silent, "writes Lara Bazelon at the New York Times.

KAMALA HARRIS DEFENSA RASHIDA TLAIB & # 39; S OUTDOOR IMPOSITION

"Most worrisome, Ms. Harris fought his teeth and nails to defend the unlawful convictions that had been secured through official misconduct including evidence of manipulation, false testimony and the removal of crucial information for the prosecutors. "

Bazelon then lists multiple cases in which the Democratic Senator did not accept criminal justice reforms, either to oppose them or decline to express an opinion.

She mentions Harris' reluctance to take a position in 2014 as opposed to Proposition 47, a voter-approved electoral measure that reduced some low level crimes to minor offenses. Bazelon is also questioning Harris for not supporting the rules on cameras used by the body for police officers.

THE CHOICE OF THE 2020 IS HERE AND CONFIRMS HOW IS THE FRONTRUNNER OF THE DEMOCRAT?

According to Bazelon, Harris also opposed a bill of 2015 requiring his office to investigate the shootings involved with the officers. The piece by Bazelon Times criticizes Harris's decision to continue prosecuting death cases as a general prosecutor, even while supposedly opposing the death penalty.

It is considered worse, according to Bazelon, it was the Harris record in cases of unlawful conviction. The writer cites the case of George Gage, who is serving a prison sentence of 70 years for allegedly sexually abusing her stepdaughter. The case was based on the testimony of the stepchain, which some have called into question.

The accusation of Harris to Daniel Larsen, who served a 28-year sentence for the possession of a concealed weapon, also raised questions. He also defended the condemnation of Johnny Baca's murder, in which the judges found that a prosecutor was lying in the trial and ceded after the video of an oral argument received national attention, writes Bazelon.

DEMS CHALLENGE TRUMP JUDICIAL NOMINEES ABOUT KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS MEMBERSHIP

"It is true that politicians must make concessions to get support from key interest groups. The strong collective opposition to the law enforcement and local associations of district lawyers can It was hard to beat the polls, but in her career, Mrs. Harris did not change or trade to get more conservative legal and order support, she gave it everything, "writes Bazelon.

Harris has also advocated for the confiscation of civilian assets, according to the National Review, even for the misfortune of the defenders of criminal justice.

"Too often, I was on the wrong side of this story," wrote Bazelon at the Times.

But even with its criminal justice record under a microscope, some see Harris as the first contender to win the 2010 presidential nomination for the presidency.

Click here to get the FOX NEWS application

The Republican strategy, Colin Reed, recently chose Harris as his first favorite to dampen what's expected to become an increasingly packed field. But his biggest vulnerability lies in his professional history, he said.

"Harris will be forced to explain past positions that are anathema to the liberals, such as defending the death penalty, laughing at the idea of ‚Äč‚Äčlegalizing marijuana and threatening parents with jail time for absenteeism," wrote Reed in a piece of Fox News opinion. "In politics, when you're explaining, you're losing."

[ad_2]
Source link