The secretary of the Provincial Party Committee drastically instructed, the matter was still unclear
The same People After receiving the request from the family of Mr. Le Van Chung, he reported serious violations of a series of officials from the People's Committee of the city of Thanh Hoa, Mr. Trinh Van Chien, headed the secretary of the Thanh Hoa Provincial Party Committee. "Hot" asked the Provincial Committee of Thanh Hoa to address the case of Mr. Chung's family, clarifying serious errors in granting 4 red books to plot no. 30 Tong Duy Tan, the Lam Son room, the city. Thanh Hoa street.
As a result, on May 24, 2019, the Committee of the Provincial Party of Thanh Hoa published official letter no. 4289 / CV / VPTU informing the opinions of Mr. Trinh Van Chien, member of the Party Central Committee, secretary of the Provincial Party Committee, president of the People's Council. The province addressed the request of Mr. Le Van Chung, resident at 47 Tong Duy Tan, in the Lam Son room, TP. Thanh Hoa.
After receiving the previous instructions from the Secretary of the Thanh Hoa Provincial Party Committee, the Thanh Hoa People's Committee reviewed the content of the request and the related documents. The Thanh Hoa People's Provincial Committee continues to transfer the request to the Thanh Hoa Provincial Police to inform the family of Mr. Le Van Chung the results of the case under the direction of the Chairman of the Provincial People's Committee in official letter 14187 / UBND-TD dated 9/11 2018, informing the secretary and chairman of the Provincial People's Committee before July 5, 2019 .
Mr Le Van Chung said that he had expired on September 7, 1919 for more than 10 days, but his family has not yet received any notice from the Thanh Hoa provincial police. Chung said that, once again, the provincial police of Thanh Hoa "soaked the shrimp" so that his family would continue waiting for justice.
According to Mr. Chung, the provincial police of Thanh Hoa did not inform his family that the result of the investigation of the case was not followed strictly by the direction of Mr. Trinh Van Chien – member of the central committee of the party, secretary of the committee of the provincial party and president. Provincial Council of the People.
Do not prosecute the officials of the city of Thanh Hoa to abandon offenders
In another development related to the case of house number 38 Tong Duy Tan, Mr. Le Van Chung has recently sent a "complaint about the decision to process a criminal case" to the provincial secretary, president of the provincial popular committee. The provincial police, director of the provincial department of popular attorney; Central Inspection Committee, Steering Committee of the Central Committee of the Vietnamese Front of the Fatherland, newspaper People, … with many other organizations from the central levels to the premises.
In the complaint, said Mr. Chung, who was the accused and also was the victim of the case of house number 38 Tong Duy Tan. "The case of the Provincial People's Committee, competent agencies, examined and concluded this case: Thanh Hoa People's Committee officials violated the law by illegally granting LURCs by Nguyen Thi Cuc, by allowing the sale and transfer from LURCs to Mr. Le Xuan Truong and Nguyen Xuan Bien, "said Chung.
The reason for the complaint The decision to process the criminal case No. 62 / PC01 dated September 3, 1919 by the Thanh Hoa Police Department in the province of Thanh Hoa was clarified by Le Van Chung: "The unusual thing here is in the content of the initiation. (The decision to process cases Penalties – PV) did not mention the illegal acts of the People's Committee of Thanh Hoa City. At the request of the supervisory team (Central Committee of the Front of the Vietnamese Country), at the request of public opinion. fact, the contents and developments of the case clearly indicate that violations of these officials play an important role in generating and promoting the case to complete, causing serious losses.
Mr. Chung cited, there is no illegal act of the LURC BD 473970 (land transplant, eradication records, … contrary to the law – PV), it is possible that Ms. Cuc does not renounce the idea of Fraud and, if he's there The idea of a scam does not have any means to deceive. The deception is not entirely impossible to prevent if the officers do not act illegally for the transfer, they publish LURC to Mr. Le Xuan Truong, reason why of this violation will continue interrupting Mr. Le Xuan Truong. transfer and issue LURC to Mr. Nguyen Xuan Bien.
"The violations of officials of the People's Committee of the city of Thanh Hoa have sufficient evidence to identify criminal signs that serve as the basis for the criminal prosecution of these officials under article 143 of the Criminal Procedure Code In addition, this unlawful act by the People's Committee of Thanh Hoa City has committed a violation of the rules of the territory's management as stipulated in article 229 and the crime of "Abusing the positions of authority in the exercise of public functions "stipulated in Article 356 Criminal Code with aggravating circumstances stipulated in Article 52 of this Code" – affirmed Chung.
Mr Le Van Chung added that the Thanh Hoa provincial police did not prosecute officials of the People's Committee of the city of Thanh Hoa, which is contrary to the leadership of the Provincial People's Committee, the Provincial Party Committee … is contrary to the provisions of the law. This is the crime, which totally deceives the content of the case. This will result in a trial, fair trial, complete and complete.
"Exercise the rights of the accused criminals specified in point C, clause 1, article 56 of the Code of criminal procedure to complain about the decision to process criminal proceedings No. 62 / PC01 dated 3/3/2019 of Co Demano respectfully to the competent authorities requesting the Thanh Hoa police department in the province of Thanh Hoa to supplement the decision to process the case to investigate, in violation of the law of civil servants. Thanh Hoa City People's Committee, of # 39 ; in accordance with the requirements and provisions of the articles: 9, 15, 18, 20, 32, 156, 160, 161, 165 and article 170 of the current criminal procedure code "- Mr. Chung pointed to the complaint.